Some of you may have noticed some changes at the old Jeanie’s Hair Fashions. Jeanie sold me her place and I’ve been doing some renovation to make it suitable for my law practice/prosecutor’s office. I am really excited about finally having a place of my own for work right in the heart of Buffalo. I think it will make a fine office for my practice for many years and an approachable and accessible prosecutor’s office our county can be proud of – at zero cost to taxpayers (that’s right: free rent is my gift to the County).
Required to attend a mediation class for the Family Court in Polk County? Here is the schedule:
ADR Class Dates for 2018
- Monday, January 22, 2018
- Monday, February 26, 2018
- Monday, March 19, 2018
- Monday, April 09, 2018
- Monday, May 21, 2018
- Monday, June 11, 2018
- Monday, July 16, 2018
- Monday, August 06, 2018
- Monday, September 17, 2018
- Monday, October 15, 2018
- Monday, November 19, 2018
- Monday, December 10, 2018
*Class time – 6:00pm to 7:00 pm
*Class location – Polk County Courthouse, 3rdfloor, large courtroom
Rule change automates the preparation of the legal file in appellate cases, potentially yielding a significant reduction in the cost of an appeal. Litigants seeking review of error at the trial court level had been required to pay for the cost of preparation of the legal file, often at a cost of several hundred, even thousands of dollars. For indigent litigants not entitled to appointed counsel or otherwise exempt, this represented an often insurmountable obstacle to appellate review. The new rules go into effect January 1, 2018. A free guide is here.
The Missouri Supreme Court recognized today a right to jury trials for tenants sued for failure to pay rent. This represents a powerful tool for tenants and may require landlords to rethink strategy in evictions. In evictions, scheduling a jury often takes months, affording tenants significant extra time in the leased property, often at landlord expense. Landlords should be prepared for significant additional time and expense in eviction cases; tenants should try to understand their rights.
Last night at the meeting of the Dallas County Republican Party, I announced my candidacy for Dallas County Prosecuting Attorney. The primary is scheduled for August 7, 2018.
I live in Buffalo with my wife, Angela, and our boys, Sean and Ryan. I am serving my second term as Alderman for the City of Buffalo where I have a perfect track record of voting to support local business and for law enforcement.
I work as a lawyer practicing in our circuit. I have 17 years’ experience as an attorney, including significant criminal practice experience involving diverse cases from traffic to murder. I have represented defendants in numerous criminal trials and served as special counsel in both municipal and state criminal cases. I have handled a number of appeals, including the Springfield Red Light Camera case resulting in the termination of automated traffic enforcement in Springfield following our success at the Missouri Supreme Court. I was also a part of the team of attorneys who asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the mass lockdown student search case at Central High School in Springfield. My research has been published in several references for attorneys and I have experience providing training to attorneys. I have won awards for providing pro bono representation to indigent clients and I was selected as a National Merit Scholar. My work has been covered in the media locally, nationally, and even internationally.
I feel I am well qualified in education, experience, commitment and temperament to serve Dallas County as your next prosecuting attorney and when the time comes, I would appreciate your vote.
A review of studies indicated only 1% of deliberate practice explained variance in performance in the professions.
Deliberate experimentation is more important than deliberate practice in a rapidly changing world.
In professions like law, experience may be less indicative of success than innovation.
A woman in Florida was arrested for DWI while riding a horse.
It was a one horsepower horse… :/
Ever wonder what happened to that one guy who went to prison? Find ’em here…
The Missouri Ethics Commission maintains a searchable database of candidates with reports of their campaign contributions. Want to know who has been funding a candidate or elected official?
How does a court decide custody? The eight factors set forth in 452.375, RSMo.:
(1) The wishes of the child’s parents as to custody and the proposed parenting plan submitted by both parties;
(2) The needs of the child for a frequent, continuing and meaningful relationship with both parents and the ability and willingness of parents to actively perform their functions as mother and father for the needs of the child;
(3) The interaction and interrelationship of the child with parents, siblings, and any other person who may significantly affect the child’s best interests;
(4) Which parent is more likely to allow the child frequent, continuing and meaningful contact with the other parent;
(5) The child’s adjustment to the child’s home, school, and community;
(6) The mental and physical health of all individuals involved, including any history of abuse of any individuals involved. If the court finds that a pattern of domestic violence as defined in section 455.010 has occurred, and, if the court also finds that awarding custody to the abusive parent is in the best interest of the child, then the court shall enter written findings of fact and conclusions of law. Custody and visitation rights shall be ordered in a manner that best protects the child and any other child or children for whom the parent has custodial or visitation rights, and the parent or other family or household member who is the victim of domestic violence from any further harm;
(7) The intention of either parent to relocate the principal residence of the child; and
(8) The wishes of a child as to the child’s custodian. The fact that a parent sends his or her child or children to a home school, as defined in section 167.031, shall not be the sole factor that a court considers in determining custody of such child or children.