“We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office.” -Aesop

Except maybe not in Missouri anymore…

The Missouri Supreme Court yesterday handed down its decision in State v. Bazell, in which the Court may have effectively overturned a great many convictions for felony stealing. If you or someone you know has a finding of guilt for felony stealing since around 2002, you may want to talk to a lawyer. It could mean the difference between being a felon and not.

What’s in a Parenting Plan?

Under Section 452.310, RSMo., a parenting plan in Missouri must meet certain requirements.

“The proposed parenting plan shall set forth the arrangements that the party believes to be in the best interest of the minor children and shall include but not be limited to:

(1) A specific written schedule detailing the custody, visitation and residential time for each child with each party including:

(a) Major holidays stating which holidays a party has each year;

(b) School holidays for school-age children;

(c) The child’s birthday, Mother’s Day and Father’s Day;

(d) Weekday and weekend schedules and for school-age children how the winter, spring, summer and other vacations from school will be spent;

(e) The times and places for transfer of the child between the parties in connection with the residential schedule;

(f) A plan for sharing transportation duties associated with the residential schedule;

(g) Appropriate times for telephone access;

(h) Suggested procedures for notifying the other party when a party requests a temporary variation from the residential schedule;

(i) Any suggested restrictions or limitations on access to a party and the reasons such restrictions are requested;

(2) A specific written plan regarding legal custody which details how the decision-making rights and responsibilities will be shared between the parties including the following:

(a) Educational decisions and methods of communicating information from the school to both parties;

(b) Medical, dental and health care decisions including how health care providers will be selected and a method of communicating medical conditions of the child and how emergency care will be handled;

(c) Extracurricular activities, including a method for determining which activities the child will participate in when those activities involve time during which each party is the custodian;

(d) Child care providers, including how such providers will be selected;

(e) Communication procedures including access to telephone numbers as appropriate;

(f) A dispute resolution procedure for those matters on which the parties disagree or in interpreting the parenting plan;

(g) If a party suggests no shared decision-making, a statement of the reasons for such a request;

(3) How the expenses of the child, including child care, educational and extraordinary expenses as defined in the child support guidelines established by the supreme court, will be paid including:

(a) The suggested amount of child support to be paid by each party;

(b) The party who will maintain or provide health insurance for the child and how the medical, dental, vision, psychological and other health care expenses of the child not paid by insurance will be paid by the parties;

(c) The payment of educational expenses, if any;

(d) The payment of extraordinary expenses of the child, if any;

(e) Child care expenses, if any;

(f) Transportation expenses, if any.”

The mayor shot a dog in 2014. Now, the ACLU is suing Walnut Grove.

We are defending a lady sued for defamation related to her criticism of a Missouri mayor. Free speech applies even to criticism of Missouri mayors. We worked with the ACLU to develop a case. They are now representing her in a federal case to protect free speech. Next time you complain about your mayor without getting sued, thank this brave lady and the defenders of free speech at the ACLU.

http://www.news-leader.com/story/news/local/ozarks/2016/08/15/mayor-shot-dog-2014-now-aclu-suing-walnut-grove/88771578/