When a new client comes to me with a case involving custody of a child, there are invariably questions about how to get a good result.
Here is the statute the courts in Missouri generally follow to decide the custody of a child. There are exceptions and the cited statute does not control in every type of case, but in divorce (also called “dissolution”) and paternity (also called “custody”) cases, it usually does.
Philosophers, historians, politicians, legal scholars, social workers, child psychologists, parents and just about anyone else could argue about all sorts of ideas for a child’s “best interests.” But here is what the courts in Missouri usually consider:
In a statement issued last week, the Federal Communications Commission paves the way to reduce the high cost of telephone calls from prison inmates to their social support network. According to one report, a 15-minute call can run as high as $17.30 for some inmates. Long distance interstate calls already have rate caps at $0.25/minute for collect calls and $0.21/minute for prepaid calls. Capping in-state rates would save the social support network of inmates $128 million/year by some estimates. Many lawyers, myself included, refuse to take calls from inmates, in part because of the expense.
Why should we care?
Communication between inmates and their social support network has been demonstrated to reduce recidivism.
The City of Springfield announced it will remove the red light cameras from intersections. The cameras have been deactivated since the 2010 Missouri Supreme Court decision in City of Springfield v. Adolph Belt, Jr. I served as the lawyer for the retired veteran highway patrolman who argued the cameras jeopardized public safety and the extra-judicial hearing process violated the basic rights of motorists.
Amos Bridges wrote a nice watchdog piece outlining the history of the case and cost to the motorists and taxpayers. Final cost of the red-light camera program to Springfield taxpayers: $461,504.62. Cost to motorists of illegal fines: $807,163.00. Legal fees paid by the City to defend the camera program in court: $124,244.62. Accidents prevented: 0.
Kudos to the City and to Councilman Burlison who, it was reported, suggested the change. Councilman Burlison has a long history of fighting for our basic freedoms. Some will remember he was one of my clients in the lock down and mass search case against Springfield Public Schools and the Greene County Sheriff’s Office that we took to the United States Supreme Court.
I represent the father of the 4 year old boy, Benjamin, for which an Endangered Person Advisory was this morning issued by the Polk County Sheriff.
My client has been and continues to follow the law and engage the court system in order to advocate for the best interests of his child. The boy was neither lost nor endangered. Nor was he ever “found.” He was never abducted from the Polk County Courthouse nor anywhere else. Indeed, he was never in Polk County during the relevant time period. Throughout the past few days, Benjamin has been safe, happy and engaged with his school, family and friends.
So, in the wake of the Edward Snowden disclosures about the NSA eavesdropping program, there has been an ongoing discussion among lawyers about how to protect the confidentiality of our client communications. This website is part of my response to that.
I changed web/email hosts and upgraded my email to include encryption between my computer and my mail server. So when I email clients (and anyone else) the transmissions are encrypted on “my side.” But they may or may not be encrypted on “your side.”
The three largest email providers, Gmail, Outlook and Yahoo!, default to SSL encryption by default, so about a billion of you are squared away. As for the rest, you should check with your service provider about encryption before you send me secret messages about your case!